linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] ASoC: da7219: remove SRM lock check retry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CF33C36214C39B4496568E5578BE70C7403CA7B2@PGSMSX108.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:32:52 +0000
From:   "Lu, Brent" <brent.lu@...el.com>
To:     Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
CC:     Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ASoC: da7219: remove SRM lock check retry

> 
> We can potentially reduce the timings here for something shorter although
> I'd need to speak with the HW team as to what, if any reduction is feasible.
> However this is not a real fix as there's potential for audible noises when you
> don't enable WCLK first. As far as I can tell the Intel platforms are capable of
> enabling clocks early, as can be seen in this board file with early SCLK enable:
> 
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/sound/soc/intel/boards/kbl_rt
> 5663_max98927.c#L99
> 
> I think there's a need to find some method to enable the WCLK signal
> otherwise there's the potential for audible artefacts when SRM finally locks
> which is not going to be pleasant.
> 

Hi Adam,

Thanks for reply. This patch is not fixing any bug. It just shorten the audio latency
on our boards. Basically we are idling there for 400ms then print a warning message
about SRM not being locked. It seems to me that 400ms is too much even for those
platforms which are able to provide WCLK before calling snd_soc_dai_set_pll()
function but it relies on your HW team to provide the number.

On KBL platform we have interface to control MCLK and I2S clocks like the link
you mentioned but WCLK seems not working on my board. I can try to ask if
someone is working on it but since we are moving to SOF. The chance is slim for
legacy firmware.

Regards,
Brent