linux-kernel - RE: [EXT] Re: [v6,1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: support property idle-state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB7PR04MB4490BD480231CD8EA46C01C08F420@DB7PR04MB4490.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:11:57 +0000
From:   Biwen Li <biwen.li@....com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     "peda@...ntia.se" <peda@...ntia.se>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [v6,1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: support property idle-state

> 
> Caution: EXT Email
> 
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 17:22:20 +0800, Biwen Li wrote:
> > This supports property idle-state
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Biwen Li <biwen.li@....com>
> > ---
> > Change in v6:
> >       - none
> >
> > Change in v5:
> >       - none
> >
> > Change in v4:
> >       - none
> >
> > Change in v3:
> >       - update subject and description
> >       - add some information for property idle-state
> >
> > Change in v2:
> >       - update subject and description
> >       - add property idle-state
> >
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux-pca954x.txt | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> 
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
> 
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
Okay, got it, thanks.