linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:19:00 +0000
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, wahrenst@....net,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, mbrugger@...e.com,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
        Nicolas Dechense <nicolas.dechesne@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] arm64: use both ZONE_DMA and ZONE_DMA32

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 10:12:50AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 10:03:17PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> > Ok, narrowing it down further, it seems its the following bit from the
> > patch:
> > 
> > > @@ -201,13 +212,18 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
> > >         struct memblock_region *reg;
> > >         unsigned long zone_size[MAX_NR_ZONES], zhole_size[MAX_NR_ZONES];
> > >         unsigned long max_dma32 = min;
> > > +       unsigned long max_dma = min;
> > >
> > >         memset(zone_size, 0, sizeof(zone_size));
> > >
> > > -       /* 4GB maximum for 32-bit only capable devices */
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> > > +       max_dma = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma_phys_limit);
> > > +       zone_size[ZONE_DMA] = max_dma - min;
> > > +       max_dma32 = max_dma;
> > > +#endif
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
> > >         max_dma32 = PFN_DOWN(arm64_dma32_phys_limit);
> > > -       zone_size[ZONE_DMA32] = max_dma32 - min;
> > > +       zone_size[ZONE_DMA32] = max_dma32 - max_dma;
> > >  #endif
> > >         zone_size[ZONE_NORMAL] = max - max_dma32;
> > >
> > > @@ -219,11 +235,17 @@ static void __init zone_sizes_init(unsigned long min, unsigned long max)
> > >
> > >                 if (start >= max)
> > >                         continue;
> > > -
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
> > > +               if (start < max_dma) {
> > > +                       unsigned long dma_end = min_not_zero(end, max_dma);
> > > +                       zhole_size[ZONE_DMA] -= dma_end - start;
> > > +               }
> > > +#endif
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32
> > >                 if (start < max_dma32) {
> > > -                       unsigned long dma_end = min(end, max_dma32);
> > > -                       zhole_size[ZONE_DMA32] -= dma_end - start;
> > > +                       unsigned long dma32_end = min(end, max_dma32);
> > > +                       unsigned long dma32_start = max(start, max_dma);
> > > +                       zhole_size[ZONE_DMA32] -= dma32_end - dma32_start;
> > >                 }
> > >  #endif
> > >                 if (end > max_dma32) {
> > 
> > The zhole_sizes end up being:
> > zhole_size: DMA: 67671, DMA32: 1145664 NORMAL: 0
> > 
> > This seems to be due to dma32_start being calculated as 786432 each
> > time - I'm guessing that's the max_dma value.
> > Where dma32_end is around 548800, but changes each iteration (so we
> > end up subtracting a negative value each pass, growing the size).
[...]
> Anyway, I've had a go at fixing it below but it's 100% untested. I think
> the issue is that your SoC has memblocks contained entirely within the
> ZONE_DMA region and we don't cater for that at all when processing the
> ZONE_DMA32 region.

This seems to be issue, the SoC memory contained withing ZONE_DMA. I
managed to reproduce it under KVM/Qemu by reducing the amount of memory
given to the guest. You'd also need NUMA disabled to hit this code path.

Your proposed change fixes it but I'll send a tested-by on the full
patch when it hits the list.

-- 
Catalin