linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode on X1 Extreme 2nd Gen 4K AMOLED panel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87lfrtinrq.fsf@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 03 Dec 2019 14:42:17 +0200
From:   Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@...el.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/i915: Force DPCD backlight mode on X1 Extreme 2nd Gen 4K AMOLED panel

On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com> wrote:
> Annoyingly, the VBT on the ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2nd Gen indicates that
> the system uses plain PWM based backlight controls, when in reality the
> only backlight controls that work are the standard VESA eDP DPCD
> backlight controls.
>
> Honestly, this makes me wonder how many other systems have these issues
> or lie about this in their VBT. Not sure we have any good way of finding
> out until panels like this become more common place in the laptop
> market. For now, just add a DRM DP quirk to indicate that this panel is
> telling the truth and is being a good LCD.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112376
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>

Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c                       |  4 ++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h                           |  8 ++++++++
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 2c7870aef469..ec7061e3a99b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -1155,6 +1155,10 @@ static const struct dpcd_quirk dpcd_quirk_list[] = {
>  	{ OUI(0x00, 0x10, 0xfa), DEVICE_ID_ANY, false, BIT(DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_PSR) },
>  	/* CH7511 seems to leave SINK_COUNT zeroed */
>  	{ OUI(0x00, 0x00, 0x00), DEVICE_ID('C', 'H', '7', '5', '1', '1'), false, BIT(DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_SINK_COUNT) },
> +	/* Optional 4K AMOLED panel in the ThinkPad X1 Extreme 2nd Generation
> +	 * only supports DPCD backlight controls, despite advertising otherwise
> +	 */
> +	{ OUI(0xba, 0x41, 0x59), DEVICE_ID_ANY, false, BIT(DP_DPCD_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT) },
>  };
>  
>  #undef OUI
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> index 87b59db9ffe3..3d61260b08ad 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
> @@ -325,11 +325,17 @@ intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  int intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs(struct intel_connector *intel_connector)
>  {
>  	struct intel_panel *panel = &intel_connector->panel;
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev);
> +	struct intel_dp *intel_dp =
> +		enc_to_intel_dp(&intel_connector->encoder->base);
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> +		to_i915(intel_connector->base.dev);
>  
>  	if (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == 0 ||
>  	    (i915_modparams.enable_dpcd_backlight == -1 &&
> -	    dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type != INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE))
> +	     dev_priv->vbt.backlight.type !=
> +		     INTEL_BACKLIGHT_VESA_EDP_AUX_INTERFACE &&
> +	     !drm_dp_has_quirk(&intel_dp->desc,
> +			       DP_DPCD_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT)))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	if (!intel_dp_aux_display_control_capable(intel_connector))
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> index 51ecb5112ef8..a444209cd54b 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> @@ -1520,6 +1520,14 @@ enum drm_dp_quirk {
>  	 * The driver should ignore SINK_COUNT during detection.
>  	 */
>  	DP_DPCD_QUIRK_NO_SINK_COUNT,
> +	/**
> +	 * @DP_DPCD_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT:
> +	 *
> +	 * The device is telling the truth when it says that it uses DPCD
> +	 * backlight controls, even if the system's firmware disagrees.
> +	 * The driver should honor the DPCD backlight capabilities advertised.
> +	 */
> +	DP_DPCD_QUIRK_FORCE_DPCD_BACKLIGHT,
>  };
>  
>  /**

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center