linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: Reenable UART TX pull-ups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5b7ff913-bca7-2695-ab72-76350778a577@gmx.de>
Date:   Tue, 3 Dec 2019 14:22:15 +0100
From:   Ingo van Lil <inguin@....de>
To:     Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Cc:     Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: at91: Reenable UART TX pull-ups

On 12/3/19 2:04 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:

> Sounds reasonable, and sorry for the breakage. However, perhaps a proper
> fixes tag (with the prescribed length of the commit hash) should be in
> there somewhere?

Sounds good, I will add one.


> Also, I think the same kind of change was made to the barebox bootloader
> at about the same time. Is there a fix for that queued up as well?

Sorry, I'm not familiar with Barebox. We use u-boot.

Regards,
Ingo