[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6ec054a4-e87b-6d3f-c23f-bbb6b219c77a@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 19:09:48 +0530
From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/pseries: Account for SPURR ticks on idle CPUs
On 11/27/19 5:31 PM, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> On PSeries LPARs, to compute the utilization, tools such as lparstat
> need to know the [S]PURR ticks when the CPUs were busy or idle.
>
> In the pseries cpuidle driver, we keep track of the idle PURR ticks in
> the VPA variable "wait_state_cycles". This patch extends the support
> to account for the idle SPURR ticks.
Thanks for working on it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists