[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191203100931.43207030@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:09:31 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v7 net-next 3/1] netronome: use the new txqueue
timeout argument
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 02:32:14 -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> untested
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
> index 41a808b14d76..26f1fb19d0aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c
> @@ -1323,13 +1323,8 @@ nfp_net_tx_ring_reset(struct nfp_net_dp *dp, struct nfp_net_tx_ring *tx_ring)
> static void nfp_net_tx_timeout(struct net_device *netdev, unsigned int txqueue)
> {
> struct nfp_net *nn = netdev_priv(netdev);
> - int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < nn->dp.netdev->real_num_tx_queues; i++) {
> - if (!netif_tx_queue_stopped(netdev_get_tx_queue(netdev, i)))
> - continue;
> - nn_warn(nn, "TX timeout on ring: %d\n", i);
> - }
> + nn_warn(nn, "TX timeout on ring: %d\n", txqueue);
%u
> nn_warn(nn, "TX watchdog timeout\n");
I think we can drop this warning now.
With that:
Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists