linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] fs: ceph: Delete timespec64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 03 Dec 2019 14:49:29 -0500
From:   Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
To:     Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        ceph-devel <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] fs: ceph: Delete timespec64_trunc() usage

On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 11:41 -0800, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> > Thanks Deepa. We'll plan to take this one in via the ceph tree.
> 
> Actually, deletion of the timespec64_trunc() will depend on this
> patch. Can we merge the series through a common tree? Otherwise,
> whoever takes the [PATCH 6/7] ("fs:
> Delete timespec64_trunc()") would have to depend on your tree. If you
> are ok with the change, can you ack it?
> 
> Thanks,
> Deepa

Sure, no problem if that works better for you.

Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>