[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191204155540.4d43df45@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 15:55:40 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sh tree with Linus' tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:25:10 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the sh tree got conflicts in:
>
> arch/sh/include/uapi/asm/setup.h
> arch/sh/include/uapi/asm/types.h
>
> between commit:
>
> d9c525229521 ("treewide: add "WITH Linux-syscall-note" to SPDX tag of uapi headers")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> cd10afbc932d ("sh: remove unneeded uapi asm-generic wrappers")
>
> from the sh tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just removed the files) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
Ping?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists