linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 093/125] decnet: fix DN_IFREQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191204175324.726824069@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed,  4 Dec 2019 18:56:38 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 093/125] decnet: fix DN_IFREQ_SIZE

From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>

[ Upstream commit 50c2936634bcb1db78a8ca63249236810c11a80f ]

Digging through the ioctls with Al because of the previous
patches, we found that on 64-bit decnet's dn_dev_ioctl()
is wrong, because struct ifreq::ifr_ifru is actually 24
bytes (not 16 as expected from struct sockaddr) due to the
ifru_map and ifru_settings members.

Clearly, decnet expects the ioctl to be called with a struct
like
  struct ifreq_dn {
    char ifr_name[IFNAMSIZ];
    struct sockaddr_dn ifr_addr;
  };

since it does
  struct ifreq *ifr = ...;
  struct sockaddr_dn *sdn = (struct sockaddr_dn *)&ifr->ifr_addr;

This means that DN_IFREQ_SIZE is too big for what it wants on
64-bit, as it is
  sizeof(struct ifreq) - sizeof(struct sockaddr) +
  sizeof(struct sockaddr_dn)

This assumes that sizeof(struct sockaddr) is the size of ifr_ifru
but that isn't true.

Fix this to use offsetof(struct ifreq, ifr_ifru).

This indeed doesn't really matter much - the result is that we
copy in/out 8 bytes more than we should on 64-bit platforms. In
case the "struct ifreq_dn" lands just on the end of a page though
it might lead to faults.

As far as I can tell, it has been like this forever, so it seems
very likely that nobody cares.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/decnet/dn_dev.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
index b2c26b081134a..80554e7e9a0f6 100644
--- a/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
+++ b/net/decnet/dn_dev.c
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
 #include <net/dn_neigh.h>
 #include <net/dn_fib.h>
 
-#define DN_IFREQ_SIZE (sizeof(struct ifreq) - sizeof(struct sockaddr) + sizeof(struct sockaddr_dn))
+#define DN_IFREQ_SIZE (offsetof(struct ifreq, ifr_ifru) + sizeof(struct sockaddr_dn))
 
 static char dn_rt_all_end_mcast[ETH_ALEN] = {0xAB,0x00,0x00,0x04,0x00,0x00};
 static char dn_rt_all_rt_mcast[ETH_ALEN]  = {0xAB,0x00,0x00,0x03,0x00,0x00};
-- 
2.20.1