lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:21:41 -0800
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, shuah <shuah@...nel.org>,
        SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix nits in the kunit

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 02:41:26PM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:08 AM SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patchset contains trivial fixes for the kunit documentations and the
> > wrapper python scripts.
> >
> > Changes from v2 (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/1575361141-6806-1-git-send-email-sj38.park@gmail.com/T/#t):
> >  - Make 'build_dir' if not exists (missed from v3 by mistake)
> >
> > SeongJae Park (5):
> >   docs/kunit/start: Use in-tree 'kunit_defconfig'
> >   kunit: Remove duplicated defconfig creation
> >   kunit: Create default config in '--build_dir'
> >   kunit: Place 'test.log' under the 'build_dir'
> >   kunit: Rename 'kunitconfig' to '.kunitconfig'
> >
> >  Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst | 13 +++++--------
> >  tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py            | 16 ++++++++++------
> >  tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py     |  8 ++++----
> >  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>

I just realized that I forgot to test for something...

The following command fails:

./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --timeout=60 --jobs=12 --defconfig

[11:17:13] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[11:17:16] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 142, in <module>
    main(sys.argv[1:])
  File "tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 135, in main
    result = run_tests(linux, request)
  File "tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py", line 67, in run_tests
    test_result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(kunit_output)
  File "/usr/local/google/home/brendanhiggins/gbmc-linux/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py", line 283, in parse_run_tests
    test_result = parse_test_result(list(isolate_kunit_output(kernel_output)))
  File "/usr/local/google/home/brendanhiggins/gbmc-linux/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_parser.py", line 54, in isolate_kunit_output
    for line in kernel_output:
  File "/usr/local/google/home/brendanhiggins/gbmc-linux/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_kernel.py", line 146, in run_kernel
    with open(os.path.join(build_dir, 'test.log'), 'w') as f:
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/posixpath.py", line 80, in join
    a = os.fspath(a)
TypeError: expected str, bytes or os.PathLike object, not NoneType

It seems as though you assume that build_dir is always populated by the flag.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ