linux-kernel - Re: ubifs mount failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191204071746.kfdflui4ziladmjg@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:17:46 +0100
From:   Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc:     naga suresh kumar <nagasureshkumarrelli@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
        linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        siva durga paladugu <siva.durga.paladugu@...ilnx.com>,
        Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: ubifs mount failure

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 08:08:48PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 11:46 AM Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 04:06:12PM +0530, naga suresh kumar wrote:
> > > Hi Richard,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 2:40 PM Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > > > > Von: "Naga Sureshkumar Relli" <nagasure@...inx.com>
> > > > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.4/source/fs/ubifs/sb.c#L164
> > > > > we are trying to allocate 4325376 (~4MB)
> > > >
> > > > 4MiB? Is ->min_io_size that large?
> > > if you see https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/fs/ubifs/sb.c#L164
> > > The size is actually ALIGN(tmp, c->min_io_size).
> > > Here tmp is of 4325376 Bytes and min_io_size is 16384 Bytes
> >
> > 'tmp' contains bogus values. Try this:
> >
> > ----------------------------8<--------------------------------
> >
> > From 34f687fce189085f55706b4cddcb288a08f4ee06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> > Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:41:20 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix wrong memory allocation
> >
> > In create_default_filesystem() when we allocate the idx node we must use
> > the idx_node_size we calculated just one line before, not tmp, which
> > contains completely other data.
> >
> > Fixes: c4de6d7e4319 ("ubifs: Refactor create_default_filesystem()")
> > Reported-by: Naga Sureshkumar Relli <nagasure@...inx.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  fs/ubifs/sb.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/ubifs/sb.c b/fs/ubifs/sb.c
> > index a551eb3e9b89..6681c18e52b8 100644
> > --- a/fs/ubifs/sb.c
> > +++ b/fs/ubifs/sb.c
> > @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static int create_default_filesystem(struct ubifs_info *c)
> >         sup = kzalloc(ALIGN(UBIFS_SB_NODE_SZ, c->min_io_size), GFP_KERNEL);
> >         mst = kzalloc(c->mst_node_alsz, GFP_KERNEL);
> >         idx_node_size = ubifs_idx_node_sz(c, 1);
> > -       idx = kzalloc(ALIGN(tmp, c->min_io_size), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +       idx = kzalloc(ALIGN(idx_node_size, c->min_io_size), GFP_KERNEL);
> >         ino = kzalloc(ALIGN(UBIFS_INO_NODE_SZ, c->min_io_size), GFP_KERNEL);
> >         cs = kzalloc(ALIGN(UBIFS_CS_NODE_SZ, c->min_io_size), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> Oh, looks good! Thanks for fixing, Sascha!

Will you apply this one? Otherwise I resend with the proper tags added.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |