[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cdb685a4-4d00-4635-df12-c67a6faa81e2@kapsi.fi>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 12:21:30 +0200
From: Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@...si.fi>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
talho@...dia.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bbasu@...dia.com,
mperttunen@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [TEGRA194_CPUFREQ Patch 1/3] firmware: tegra: adding function to
get BPMP data
Ah, it seems I was mistaken here. Thanks for the information.
Thanks,
Mikko
On 4.12.2019 11.17, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 04-12-19, 10:45, Mikko Perttunen wrote:
>> Now, my original patchset (which this series is based on) did add
>> nvidia,bpmp properties on the CPU DT nodes itself and query BPMP based on
>> that. A change is still required for that since tegra_bpmp_get() currently
>> takes a 'struct device *' which we don't have for a CPU DT node.
>
> I may be missing the context, but the CPUs always have a struct device
> * for them, which we get via a call to get_cpu_device(cpu), isn't ?
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists