[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191204144106.10876-1-alexandre.torgue@st.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 15:41:06 +0100
From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<alexandre.torgue@...com>, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: pinmux: fix a possible null pointer in pinmux_can_be_used_for_gpio
This commit adds a check on ops pointer to avoid a kernel panic when
ops->strict is used. Indeed, on some pinctrl driver (at least for
pinctrl-stmfx) the pinmux ops is not implemented. Let's assume than gpio
can be used in this case.
Fixes: 472a61e777fe ("pinctrl/gpio: Take MUX usage into account")
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
index e914f6efd39e..9503ddf2edc7 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ bool pinmux_can_be_used_for_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned pin)
const struct pinmux_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->pmxops;
/* Can't inspect pin, assume it can be used */
- if (!desc)
+ if (!desc || !ops)
return true;
if (ops->strict && desc->mux_usecount)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists