linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate various cache flush ops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191204094159.7b3e4100@jacob-builder>
Date:   Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:41:59 -0800
From:   Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, ashok.raj@...el.com,
        kevin.tian@...el.com, Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] iommu/vt-d: Consolidate various cache flush ops

On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 08:32:17 +0800
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Jacob,
> 
> On 12/4/19 12:50 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 10:44:45 +0800
> > Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> Hi Jacob,
> >>
> >> On 12/3/19 4:02 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:  
> >>> On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:04:44 +0800
> >>> Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>  wrote:
> >>>      
> >>>> Intel VT-d 3.0 introduces more caches and interfaces for software
> >>>> to flush when it runs in the scalable mode. Currently various
> >>>> cache flush helpers are scattered around. This consolidates them
> >>>> by putting them in the existing iommu_flush structure.
> >>>>
> >>>> /* struct iommu_flush - Intel IOMMU cache invalidation ops
> >>>>    *
> >>>>    * @cc_inv: invalidate context cache
> >>>>    * @iotlb_inv: Invalidate IOTLB and paging structure caches
> >>>> when software
> >>>>    *             has changed second-level tables.
> >>>>    * @p_iotlb_inv: Invalidate IOTLB and paging structure caches
> >>>> when software
> >>>>    *               has changed first-level tables.
> >>>>    * @pc_inv: invalidate pasid cache
> >>>>    * @dev_tlb_inv: invalidate cached mappings used by
> >>>> requests-without-PASID
> >>>>    *               from the Device-TLB on a endpoint device.
> >>>>    * @p_dev_tlb_inv: invalidate cached mappings used by
> >>>> requests-with-PASID
> >>>>    *                 from the Device-TLB on an endpoint device
> >>>>    */
> >>>> struct iommu_flush {
> >>>>           void (*cc_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did,
> >>>>                          u16 sid, u8 fm, u64 type);
> >>>>           void (*iotlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did,
> >>>> u64 addr, unsigned int size_order, u64 type);
> >>>>           void (*p_iotlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did,
> >>>> u32 pasid, u64 addr, unsigned long npages, bool ih);
> >>>>           void (*pc_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did, u32
> >>>> pasid, u64 granu);
> >>>>           void (*dev_tlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 sid,
> >>>> u16 pfsid, u16 qdep, u64 addr, unsigned int mask);
> >>>>           void (*p_dev_tlb_inv)(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16
> >>>> sid, u16 pfsid, u32 pasid, u16 qdep, u64 addr,
> >>>>                                 unsigned long npages);
> >>>> };
> >>>>
> >>>> The name of each cache flush ops is defined according to the spec
> >>>> section 6.5 so that people are easy to look up them in the spec.
> >>>>     
> >>> Nice consolidation. For nested SVM, I also introduced cache
> >>> flushed helpers as needed.
> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/24/857
> >>>
> >>> Should I wait for yours to be merged or you want to extend the
> >>> this consolidation after SVA/SVM cache flush? I expect to send my
> >>> v8 shortly.  
> >>
> >> Please base your v8 patch on this series. So it could get more
> >> chances for test.
> >>  
> > Sounds good.  
> 
> I am sorry I need to spend more time on this patch series. Please go
> ahead without it.
> 
NP, let me know when you need testing.