lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191205054505.wulhkajz64lwwffc@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 5 Dec 2019 13:45:05 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+c2f1558d49e25cc36e5e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] crypto: af_alg - Use bh_lock_sock in sk_destruct

On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 08:59:11PM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> crypto layer (hash_sock_destruct()) is called from rcu callback (this in BH context) but tries to grab a socket lock.
> 
> A socket lock can schedule, which is illegal in BH context.

Fair enough.  Although I was rather intrigued as to how the RCU call
occured in the first place.  After some digging my theory is that
this is due to a SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF or SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_EBPF
setsockopt on the crypto socket.

What are these filters even suppposed to do on an af_alg socket?

Anyhow, this is a bug that could have been triggered even without
this, but it would have been almost impossible to do it through
syzbot as you need to have an outstanding async skcipher/aead request
that is freed in BH context.

---8<---
As af_alg_release_parent may be called from BH context (most notably
due to an async request that only completes after socket closure,
or as reported here because of an RCU-delayed sk_destruct call), we
must use bh_lock_sock instead of lock_sock.

Reported-by: syzbot+c2f1558d49e25cc36e5e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Fixes: c840ac6af3f8 ("crypto: af_alg - Disallow bind/setkey/...")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>

diff --git a/crypto/af_alg.c b/crypto/af_alg.c
index 0dceaabc6321..3d8e53010cda 100644
--- a/crypto/af_alg.c
+++ b/crypto/af_alg.c
@@ -134,11 +134,13 @@ void af_alg_release_parent(struct sock *sk)
 	sk = ask->parent;
 	ask = alg_sk(sk);
 
-	lock_sock(sk);
+	local_bh_disable();
+	bh_lock_sock(sk);
 	ask->nokey_refcnt -= nokey;
 	if (!last)
 		last = !--ask->refcnt;
-	release_sock(sk);
+	bh_unlock_sock(sk);
+	local_bh_enable();
 
 	if (last)
 		sock_put(sk);
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ