lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7467899.rIHYG2lMSP@e123338-lin>
Date:   Thu, 5 Dec 2019 12:02:45 +0000
From:   Mihail Atanassov <Mihail.Atanassov@....com>
To:     "james qian wang (Arm Technology China)" <james.qian.wang@....com>
CC:     nd <nd@....com>, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
        nd <nd@....com>, "airlied@...ux.ie" <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Brian Starkey <Brian.Starkey@....com>,
        "maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com" 
        <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Jonathan Chai (Arm Technology China)" <Jonathan.Chai@....com>,
        "Julien Yin (Arm Technology China)" <Julien.Yin@....com>,
        "Thomas Sun (Arm Technology China)" <thomas.Sun@....com>,
        "Lowry Li (Arm Technology China)" <Lowry.Li@....com>,
        "Tiannan Zhu (Arm Technology China)" <Tiannan.Zhu@....com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Ben Davis <Ben.Davis@....com>,
        "Oscar Zhang (Arm Technology China)" <Oscar.Zhang@....com>,
        "Channing Chen (Arm Technology China)" <Channing.Chen@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/komeda: Enable new product D32 support

On Thursday, 5 December 2019 08:53:02 GMT james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 09:59:57AM +0000, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 3 December 2019 06:46:06 GMT james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:07:52AM +0000, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, 21 November 2019 08:17:45 GMT james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> > > > > D32 is simple version of D71, the difference is:
> > > > > - Only has one pipeline
> > > > > - Drop the periph block and merge it to GCU
> > > > > 
> > > > > v2: Rebase.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China) <james.qian.wang@....com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  .../drm/arm/display/include/malidp_product.h  |  3 +-
> > > > >  .../arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c    |  2 +-
> > > > >  .../gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_dev.c  | 43 ++++++++++++-------
> > > > >  .../gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_regs.h | 13 ++++++
> > > > >  .../gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_drv.c   |  1 +
> > > > >  5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/include/malidp_product.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/include/malidp_product.h
> > > > > index 96e2e4016250..dbd3d4765065 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/include/malidp_product.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/include/malidp_product.h
> > > > > @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@
> > > > >  #define MALIDP_CORE_ID_STATUS(__core_id)     (((__u32)(__core_id)) & 0xFF)
> > > > >  
> > > > >  /* Mali-display product IDs */
> > > > > -#define MALIDP_D71_PRODUCT_ID   0x0071
> > > > > +#define MALIDP_D71_PRODUCT_ID	0x0071
> > > > > +#define MALIDP_D32_PRODUCT_ID	0x0032
> > > > >  
> > > > >  union komeda_config_id {
> > > > >  	struct {
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c
> > > > > index 6dadf4413ef3..c7f7e9c545c7 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c
> > > > > @@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@ static int d71_timing_ctrlr_init(struct d71_dev *d71,
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	ctrlr = to_ctrlr(c);
> > > > >  
> > > > > -	ctrlr->supports_dual_link = true;
> > > > > +	ctrlr->supports_dual_link = d71->supports_dual_link;
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	return 0;
> > > > >  }
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_dev.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_dev.c
> > > > > index 9b3bf353b6cc..2d429e310e5b 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_dev.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_dev.c
> > > > > @@ -371,23 +371,33 @@ static int d71_enum_resources(struct komeda_dev *mdev)
> > > > >  		goto err_cleanup;
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >  
> > > > > -	/* probe PERIPH */
> > > > > +	/* Only the legacy HW has the periph block, the newer merges the periph
> > > > > +	 * into GCU
> > > > > +	 */
> > > > >  	value = malidp_read32(d71->periph_addr, BLK_BLOCK_INFO);
> > > > > -	if (BLOCK_INFO_BLK_TYPE(value) != D71_BLK_TYPE_PERIPH) {
> > > > > -		DRM_ERROR("access blk periph but got blk: %d.\n",
> > > > > -			  BLOCK_INFO_BLK_TYPE(value));
> > > > > -		err = -EINVAL;
> > > > > -		goto err_cleanup;
> > > > > +	if (BLOCK_INFO_BLK_TYPE(value) != D71_BLK_TYPE_PERIPH)
> > > > > +		d71->periph_addr = NULL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (d71->periph_addr) {
> > > > > +		/* probe PERIPHERAL in legacy HW */
> > > > > +		value = malidp_read32(d71->periph_addr, PERIPH_CONFIGURATION_ID);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		d71->max_line_size	= value & PERIPH_MAX_LINE_SIZE ? 4096 : 2048;
> > > > > +		d71->max_vsize		= 4096;
> > > > > +		d71->num_rich_layers	= value & PERIPH_NUM_RICH_LAYERS ? 2 : 1;
> > > > > +		d71->supports_dual_link	= !!(value & PERIPH_SPLIT_EN);
> > > > > +		d71->integrates_tbu	= !!(value & PERIPH_TBU_EN);
> > > > > +	} else {
> > > > > +		value = malidp_read32(d71->gcu_addr, GCU_CONFIGURATION_ID0);
> > > > > +		d71->max_line_size	= GCU_MAX_LINE_SIZE(value);
> > > > > +		d71->max_vsize		= GCU_MAX_NUM_LINES(value);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +		value = malidp_read32(d71->gcu_addr, GCU_CONFIGURATION_ID1);
> > > > > +		d71->num_rich_layers	= GCU_NUM_RICH_LAYERS(value);
> > > > > +		d71->supports_dual_link	= GCU_DISPLAY_SPLIT_EN(value);
> > > > > +		d71->integrates_tbu	= GCU_DISPLAY_TBU_EN(value);
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >  
> > > > > -	value = malidp_read32(d71->periph_addr, PERIPH_CONFIGURATION_ID);
> > > > > -
> > > > > -	d71->max_line_size	= value & PERIPH_MAX_LINE_SIZE ? 4096 : 2048;
> > > > > -	d71->max_vsize		= 4096;
> > > > > -	d71->num_rich_layers	= value & PERIPH_NUM_RICH_LAYERS ? 2 : 1;
> > > > > -	d71->supports_dual_link	= value & PERIPH_SPLIT_EN ? true : false;
> > > > > -	d71->integrates_tbu	= value & PERIPH_TBU_EN ? true : false;
> > > > > -
> > > > >  	for (i = 0; i < d71->num_pipelines; i++) {
> > > > >  		pipe = komeda_pipeline_add(mdev, sizeof(struct d71_pipeline),
> > > > >  					   &d71_pipeline_funcs);
> > > > > @@ -415,7 +425,7 @@ static int d71_enum_resources(struct komeda_dev *mdev)
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	/* loop the register blks and probe */
> > > > > -	i = 2; /* exclude GCU and PERIPH */
> > > > > +	i = 1; /* exclude GCU */
> > > > >  	offset = D71_BLOCK_SIZE; /* skip GCU */
> > > > >  	while (i < d71->num_blocks) {
> > > > >  		blk_base = mdev->reg_base + (offset >> 2);
> > > > > @@ -425,9 +435,9 @@ static int d71_enum_resources(struct komeda_dev *mdev)
> > > > >  			err = d71_probe_block(d71, &blk, blk_base);
> > > > >  			if (err)
> > > > >  				goto err_cleanup;
> > > > > -			i++;
> > > > >  		}
> > > > >  
> > > > > +		i++;
> > > > 
> > > > This change doesn't make much sense if you want to count how many
> > > > blocks are available, since you're now counting the reserved ones, too.
> > > 
> > > That's because for D32 num_blocks includes the reserved blocks.
> > > 
> > > > On the counting note, the prior code rides on the assumption the periph
> > > > block is last in the map, and I don't see how you still handle not
> > > > counting it in the D71 case.
> > > 
> > > Since D71 has one reserved block, and now we count reserved block.
> > > 
> > > So now no matter D32 or D71:
> > >   num_blocks = n_valid_block + n_reserved_block + GCU.
> > 
> > So at least we need that comment dropped in with the code. Future HW
> > might break your assumption here once more and it will then be useful
> > to know why this works for both products.
> 
> OK, will add a comments like.
> 
> /* Per HW design: num_blocks = n_valid_block + n_reserved_block + GCU */
> 
> And Per HW, all arch-v1.x include (d71/d32/d77) follows this rule,
> the old logic which skip the reserved-block actually not right.

Well, given this ^...

> 
> > I'd personally abstract that a bit behind a small helper func and
> > handle different products separately. It's a bit of duplication but
> > much easier to comprehend. Saved cycles reading code == Good Thing(tm).

...then my comment here ^ no longer applies. :)

I'd be a bit happier if that fix is split out into its own patch. Mind
doing that?

> 
> Our komeda driver has two layers, common layer and chip. current we
> only have one chip folder d71 for support arch-v1.x prodcut.
> And our future products (arch-v2.x) will have its own chip folder, and
> its own chip specific code.

The point is moot now, but I meant adding a few small static functions in
the same file. Nothing to do with layering :).

> 
> Thanks
> James
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > James
> > > > 
> > > > >  		offset += D71_BLOCK_SIZE;
> > > > >  	}
> > > > >  
> > > > > @@ -603,6 +613,7 @@ d71_identify(u32 __iomem *reg_base, struct komeda_chip_info *chip)
> > > > >  
> > > > >  	switch (product_id) {
> > > > >  	case MALIDP_D71_PRODUCT_ID:
> > > > > +	case MALIDP_D32_PRODUCT_ID:
> > > > >  		funcs = &d71_chip_funcs;
> > > > >  		break;
> > > > >  	default:
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_regs.h
> > > > > index 1727dc993909..81de6a23e7f3 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_regs.h
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_regs.h
> > > > > @@ -72,6 +72,19 @@
> > > > >  #define GCU_CONTROL_MODE(x)	((x) & 0x7)
> > > > >  #define GCU_CONTROL_SRST	BIT(16)
> > > > >  
> > > > > +/* GCU_CONFIGURATION registers */
> > > > > +#define GCU_CONFIGURATION_ID0	0x100
> > > > > +#define GCU_CONFIGURATION_ID1	0x104
> > > > > +
> > > > > +/* GCU configuration */
> > > > > +#define GCU_MAX_LINE_SIZE(x)	((x) & 0xFFFF)
> > > > > +#define GCU_MAX_NUM_LINES(x)	((x) >> 16)
> > > > > +#define GCU_NUM_RICH_LAYERS(x)	((x) & 0x7)
> > > > > +#define GCU_NUM_PIPELINES(x)	(((x) >> 3) & 0x7)
> > > > > +#define GCU_NUM_SCALERS(x)	(((x) >> 6) & 0x7)
> > > > > +#define GCU_DISPLAY_SPLIT_EN(x)	(((x) >> 16) & 0x1)
> > > > > +#define GCU_DISPLAY_TBU_EN(x)	(((x) >> 17) & 0x1)
> > > > > +
> > > > >  /* GCU opmode */
> > > > >  #define INACTIVE_MODE		0
> > > > >  #define TBU_CONNECT_MODE	1
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_drv.c
> > > > > index b7a1097c45c4..ad38bbc7431e 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_drv.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/komeda_drv.c
> > > > > @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ static int komeda_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > >  
> > > > >  static const struct of_device_id komeda_of_match[] = {
> > > > >  	{ .compatible = "arm,mali-d71", .data = d71_identify, },
> > > > > +	{ .compatible = "arm,mali-d32", .data = d71_identify, },
> > > > >  	{},
> > > > >  };
> > > > >  
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 


-- 
Mihail



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ