[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <64c5b8b423774029c3030ae778bf214d36499d2a.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 15:50:07 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9 45/47] Smack: Dont ignore other bprm->unsafe flags
if LSM_UNSAFE_PTRACE is set
On Sun, 2019-10-06 at 19:21 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
>
> commit 3675f052b43ba51b99b85b073c7070e083f3e6fb upstream.
[...]
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -949,7 +949,8 @@ static int smack_bprm_set_creds(struct l
>
> if (rc != 0)
> return rc;
> - } else if (bprm->unsafe)
> + }
> + if (bprm->unsafe & ~LSM_UNSAFE_PTRACE)
I think this needs to be ~(LSM_UNSAFE_PTRACE | LSM_UNSAFE_PTRACE_CAP)
for 4.9 and older branches.
Ben.
> return -EPERM;
>
> bsp->smk_task = isp->smk_task;
>
>
--
Ben Hutchings
Every program is either trivial or else contains at least one bug
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists