lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Dec 2019 22:35:13 +0530
From:   Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To:     Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Cc:     Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add debug defconfigs

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 10:31 PM Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, Anup Patel wrote:
>
> > I understand that you need DEBUG options for SiFive internal
> > use
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > This is the right time to introduce debug defconfigs so that you can
> > use it for your SiFive internal use
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > and you can find an alternative way to enable DEBUG options for SiFive
> > internal use.
>
> What leads you to conclude that this was done for SiFive internal use?

Why else you need it ?

It is not at all a standard practice to put DEBUG options in defconfigs
across architectures.

Regards,
Anup

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ