[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtBH9ff=efTeJbM4UdzrHCXZs7wwn=pdE4As8pB859e++Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 18:27:51 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Optimize select_idle_core
Hi Srikar,
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 18:23, Srikar Dronamraju
<srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Currently we loop through all threads of a core to evaluate if the core
> is idle or not. This is unnecessary. If a thread of a core is not
> idle, skip evaluating other threads of a core.
I think that the goal is also to clear all CPUs of the core from the
cpumask of the loop above so it will not try the same core next time
>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 69a81a5709ff..b9d628128cfc 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5872,10 +5872,12 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int
> bool idle = true;
>
> for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
> - __cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpus);
> - if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu))
> + if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu)) {
> idle = false;
> + break;
> + }
> }
> + cpumask_andnot(cpus, cpus, cpu_smt_mask(core));
>
> if (idle)
> return core;
> --
> 2.18.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists