lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDp097ww0war7H1THtRxDWzA3CDuokDQSUoqzRDcD1d3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Dec 2019 19:52:40 +0100
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Optimize select_idle_core

On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 18:52, Srikar Dronamraju
<srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> * Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> [2019-12-05 18:27:51]:
>
> > Hi Srikar,
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 18:23, Srikar Dronamraju
> > <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently we loop through all threads of a core to evaluate if the core
> > > is idle or not. This is unnecessary. If a thread of a core is not
> > > idle, skip evaluating other threads of a core.
> >
> > I think that the goal is also to clear all CPUs of the core from the
> > cpumask  of the loop above so it will not try the same core next time
> >
> > >
>
> That goal we still continue to maintain by the way of cpumask_andnot.
> i.e instead of clearing CPUs one at a time, we clear all the CPUs in the
> core at one shot.

ah yes sorry, I have been to quick and overlooked the cpumask_andnot line

>
> > > Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > ---
> > >  kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 ++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > index 69a81a5709ff..b9d628128cfc 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > > @@ -5872,10 +5872,12 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int
> > >                 bool idle = true;
> > >
> > >                 for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
> > > -                       __cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpus);
> > > -                       if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu))
> > > +                       if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu)) {
> > >                                 idle = false;
> > > +                               break;
> > > +                       }
> > >                 }
> > > +               cpumask_andnot(cpus, cpus, cpu_smt_mask(core));
> > >
> > >                 if (idle)
> > >                         return core;
> > > --
> > > 2.18.1
> > >
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards
> Srikar Dronamraju
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ