linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] net/tls: Fix return values to avoid ENOTSUPP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191205113411.5e672807@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Thu, 5 Dec 2019 11:34:11 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Valentin Vidic <vvidic@...entin-vidic.from.hr>
Cc:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>,
        Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@...lanox.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net/tls: Fix return values to avoid ENOTSUPP

On Thu,  5 Dec 2019 07:41:18 +0100, Valentin Vidic wrote:
> ENOTSUPP is not available in userspace, for example:
> 
>   setsockopt failed, 524, Unknown error 524
> 
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Vidic <vvidic@...entin-vidic.from.hr>

> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_device.c b/net/tls/tls_device.c
> index 0683788bbef0..cd91ad812291 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_device.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_device.c
> @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static int tls_push_data(struct sock *sk,
>  
>  	if (flags &
>  	    ~(MSG_MORE | MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL | MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST))
> -		return -ENOTSUPP;
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(sk->sk_err))
>  		return -sk->sk_err;
> @@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ int tls_device_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page *page,
>  	lock_sock(sk);
>  
>  	if (flags & MSG_OOB) {
> -		rc = -ENOTSUPP;
> +		rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;

Perhaps the flag checks should return EINVAL? Willem any opinions?

>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1023,7 +1023,7 @@ int tls_set_device_offload(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *ctx)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!(netdev->features & NETIF_F_HW_TLS_TX)) {
> -		rc = -ENOTSUPP;
> +		rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  		goto release_netdev;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ int tls_set_device_offload_rx(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *ctx)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!(netdev->features & NETIF_F_HW_TLS_RX)) {
> -		rc = -ENOTSUPP;
> +		rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  		goto release_netdev;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_main.c b/net/tls/tls_main.c
> index bdca31ffe6da..5830b8e02a36 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_main.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_main.c
> @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static int do_tls_setsockopt_conf(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
>  	/* check version */
>  	if (crypto_info->version != TLS_1_2_VERSION &&
>  	    crypto_info->version != TLS_1_3_VERSION) {
> -		rc = -ENOTSUPP;
> +		rc = -EINVAL;

This one I think Willem asked to be EOPNOTSUPP OTOH.

>  		goto err_crypto_info;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ static int tls_init(struct sock *sk)
>  	 * share the ulp context.
>  	 */
>  	if (sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED)
> -		return -ENOTSUPP;
> +		return -ENOTCONN;
>  
>  	/* allocate tls context */
>  	write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> index da9f9ce51e7b..2969dc30e4e0 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> @@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ int tls_sw_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (msg->msg_flags & ~(MSG_MORE | MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL))
> -		return -ENOTSUPP;
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&tls_ctx->tx_lock);
>  	lock_sock(sk);
> @@ -1215,7 +1215,7 @@ int tls_sw_sendpage_locked(struct sock *sk, struct page *page,
>  	if (flags & ~(MSG_MORE | MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL |
>  		      MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST | MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY |
>  		      MSG_NO_SHARED_FRAGS))
> -		return -ENOTSUPP;
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
>  	return tls_sw_do_sendpage(sk, page, offset, size, flags);
>  }
> @@ -1228,7 +1228,7 @@ int tls_sw_sendpage(struct sock *sk, struct page *page,
>  
>  	if (flags & ~(MSG_MORE | MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL |
>  		      MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST | MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY))
> -		return -ENOTSUPP;
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

Same suggestion for flags checks in tls_sw.c

>  
>  	mutex_lock(&tls_ctx->tx_lock);
>  	lock_sock(sk);
> @@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ ssize_t tls_sw_splice_read(struct socket *sock,  loff_t *ppos,
>  
>  		/* splice does not support reading control messages */
>  		if (ctx->control != TLS_RECORD_TYPE_DATA) {
> -			err = -ENOTSUPP;
> +			err = -EINVAL;
>  			goto splice_read_end;
>  		}
>