[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191205222928.GD25107@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 23:29:28 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
syzbot+7857962b4d45e602b8ad@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 242/321] kvm: properly check debugfs dentry before
using it
Hi!
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> [ Upstream commit 8ed0579c12b2fe56a1fac2f712f58fc26c1dc49b ]
>
> debugfs can now report an error code if something went wrong instead of
> just NULL. So if the return value is to be used as a "real" dentry, it
> needs to be checked if it is an error before dereferencing it.
>
> This is now happening because of ff9fb72bc077 ("debugfs: return error
> values, not NULL"). syzbot has found a way to trigger multiple debugfs
> files attempting to be created, which fails, and then the error code
> gets passed to dentry_path_raw() which obviously does not like it.
4.19-stable does not contain patch ff9fb72bc077, so is this still good
idea? It should not break anything, as it still uses IS_ERR_OR_NULL,
but...
Best regards,
Pavel
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -3990,7 +3990,7 @@ static void kvm_uevent_notify_change(unsigned int type, struct kvm *kvm)
> }
> add_uevent_var(env, "PID=%d", kvm->userspace_pid);
>
> - if (kvm->debugfs_dentry) {
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(kvm->debugfs_dentry)) {
> char *tmp, *p = kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> if (p) {
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists