linux-kernel - [PATCH v9 09/10] x86: spp: Add SPP protection check in emulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191206082634.21042-10-weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Date:   Fri,  6 Dec 2019 16:26:33 +0800
From:   Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
        sean.j.christopherson@...el.com
Cc:     yu.c.zhang@...ux.intel.com, alazar@...defender.com,
        edwin.zhai@...el.com, Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v9 09/10] x86: spp: Add SPP protection check in emulation

In instruction/mmio emulation cases, if the target write memroy
is SPP protected, exit to user-space to handle it as if it's
caused by SPP induced EPT violation due to guest write.

Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 85aa13dedb9d..c41a92ceb827 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5569,6 +5569,37 @@ static const struct read_write_emulator_ops write_emultor = {
 	.write = true,
 };
 
+static bool is_emulator_spp_protected(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				      gpa_t gpa,
+				      unsigned int bytes)
+{
+	gfn_t gfn, start_gfn, end_gfn;
+	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
+	struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
+	u32 *access;
+
+	if (!kvm->arch.spp_active)
+		return false;
+
+	start_gfn = gpa >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	end_gfn = (gpa + bytes) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+	for (gfn = start_gfn; gfn <= end_gfn; gfn++) {
+		slot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, gfn);
+		if (slot) {
+			access = gfn_to_subpage_wp_info(slot, gfn);
+			if (access && *access != FULL_SPP_ACCESS) {
+				vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_SPP;
+				vcpu->run->spp.addr = gfn;
+				vcpu->run->spp.ins_len =
+					kvm_x86_ops->get_inst_len(vcpu);
+				return true;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int emulator_read_write_onepage(unsigned long addr, void *val,
 				       unsigned int bytes,
 				       struct x86_exception *exception,
@@ -5599,6 +5630,9 @@ static int emulator_read_write_onepage(unsigned long addr, void *val,
 			return X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT;
 	}
 
+	if (write && is_emulator_spp_protected(vcpu, gpa, bytes))
+		return X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE;
+
 	if (!ret && ops->read_write_emulate(vcpu, gpa, val, bytes))
 		return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
 
@@ -6660,6 +6694,9 @@ int x86_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		return EMULATE_DONE;
 
 	if (r == EMULATION_FAILED) {
+		if (vcpu->run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_SPP)
+			return 0;
+
 		if (reexecute_instruction(vcpu, cr2, write_fault_to_spt,
 					emulation_type))
 			return EMULATE_DONE;
-- 
2.17.2