linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm: remove excessive permission check in kvm_arch_prepare_memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 06 Dec 2019 11:43:48 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Jia He <justin.he@....com>
Cc:     James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm: remove excessive permission check in  kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region

On 2019-12-06 02:08, Jia He wrote:
> In kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region, arm kvm regards the memory region 
> as
> writable if the flag has no KVM_MEM_READONLY, and the vm is readonly 
> if
> !VM_WRITE.
>
> But there is common usage for setting kvm memory region as follows:
> e.g. qemu side (see the PROT_NONE flag)
> 1. mmap(NULL, size, PROT_NONE, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
>    memory_region_init_ram_ptr()
> 2. re mmap the above area with read/write authority.
>
> Such example is used in virtio-fs qemu codes which hasn't been 
> upstreamed
> [1]. But seems we can't forbid this example.
>
> Without this patch, it will cause an EPERM during 
> kvm_set_memory_region()
> and cause qemu boot crash.
>
> As told by Ard, "the underlying assumption is incorrect, i.e., that 
> the
> value of vm_flags at this point in time defines how the VMA is used
> during its lifetime. There may be other cases where a VMA is created
> with VM_READ vm_flags that are changed to VM_READ|VM_WRITE later, and
> we are currently rejecting this use case as well."
>
> [1]
> 
> https://gitlab.com/virtio-fs/qemu/blob/5a356e/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs.c#L488
>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jia He <justin.he@....com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 9 ---------
>  1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> index 38b4c910b6c3..a48994af70b8 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> @@ -2301,15 +2301,6 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm 
> *kvm,
>  		if (!vma || vma->vm_start >= reg_end)
>  			break;
>
> -		/*
> -		 * Mapping a read-only VMA is only allowed if the
> -		 * memory region is configured as read-only.
> -		 */
> -		if (writable && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE)) {
> -			ret = -EPERM;
> -			break;
> -		}
> -
>  		/*
>  		 * Take the intersection of this VMA with the memory region
>  		 */

Applied, thanks.

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...