linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] ptrace: add PTRACE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191206141045.GA22803@cisco>
Date:   Fri, 6 Dec 2019 07:10:45 -0700
From:   Tycho Andersen <tycho@...ho.ws>
To:     Sargun Dhillon <sargun@...gun.me>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ptrace: add PTRACE_GETFD request

On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 11:44:53PM +0000, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
> PTRACE_GETFD is a generic ptrace API that allows the tracer to
> get file descriptors from the traceee.
> 
> The primary reason to use this syscall is to allow sandboxers to

I might change this to "one motivation to use this ptrace command",
because I'm sure people will invent other crazy uses soon after it's
added :)

> take action on an FD on behalf of the tracee. For example, this
> can be combined with seccomp's user notification feature to extract
> a file descriptor and call privileged syscalls, like binding
> a socket to a privileged port.

This can already be accomplished via injecting parasite code like CRIU
does; adding a ptrace() command like this makes it much nicer to be
sure, but it is redundant.

Tycho