[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191206142418.GP28317@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 15:24:18 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>
Cc: "thomas_os@...pmail.org" <thomas_os@...pmail.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"christian.koenig@....com" <christian.koenig@....com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pv-drivers <Pv-drivers@...are.com>,
"rcampbell@...dia.com" <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"jglisse@...hat.com" <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Linux-graphics-maintainer <Linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm, drm/ttm: Fix vm page protection handling
On Fri 06-12-19 14:16:10, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 11:30 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 06-12-19 09:24:26, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
> > [...]
> > > @@ -283,11 +282,26 @@ vm_fault_t ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved(struct
> > > vm_fault *vmf,
> > > pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
> > > }
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * Note that the value of @prot at this point may
> > > differ from
> > > + * the value of @vma->vm_page_prot in the caching- and
> > > + * encryption bits. This is because the exact location
> > > of the
> > > + * data may not be known at mmap() time and may also
> > > change
> > > + * at arbitrary times while the data is mmap'ed.
> > > + * This is ok as long as @vma->vm_page_prot is not used
> > > by
> > > + * the core vm to set caching- and encryption bits.
> > > + * This is ensured by core vm using pte_modify() to
> > > modify
> > > + * page table entry protection bits (that function
> > > preserves
> > > + * old caching- and encryption bits), and the @fault
> > > + * callback being the only function that creates new
> > > + * page table entries.
> > > + */
> >
> > While this is a very valuable piece of information I believe we need
> > to
> > document this in the generic code where everybody will find it.
> > vmf_insert_mixed_prot sounds like a good place to me. So being
> > explicit
> > about VM_MIXEDMAP. Also a reference from vm_page_prot to this
> > function
> > would be really helpeful.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
>
> Just to make sure I understand correctly. You'd prefer this (or
> similar) text to be present at the vmf_insert_mixed_prot() and
> vmf_insert_pfn_prot() definitions for MIXEDMAP and PFNMAP respectively,
> and a pointer from vm_page_prot to that text. Is that correct?
Yes. You can keep whatever is specific to TTM here but the rest should
be somewhere visible to users of the interface and a note at
vm_page_prot should help anybody touching the generic/core code to not
break those expectations.
Thanks!
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists