[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191206153821.GE31721@krava>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 16:38:21 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] libperf: Move libperf under tools/lib/perf
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 12:33:51PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 04:07:06PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 11:27:54AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 02:55:11PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > > Moving libperf from its current location under perf
> > > > to separate directory under tools/lib.
> > >
> > > Breaks the build/bisection:
> >
> > yes, I noted that in the cover email, the 2nd patch repairs paths,
> > but those changes would get lost in the move.. I can squash it
> > if you want, but I thought this is more transparent despite the
> > one-commit-long broken bisect ;-)
>
> It may well be, but bisection for me is of primary importance, so please
> avoid breaking it,
ok, will squash it and send new version
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists