linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] pipe: Fixes [ver #2]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wj42ROD+dj1Nix=X7Raa9YjLfXykFczy0BkMqAXsFeLVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Dec 2019 09:09:10 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] pipe: Fixes [ver #2]

On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:56 AM David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> For reference, I've retested current master (b0d4beaa5a4b7d), that
> incldes the 2 pipe fixes, the test still hangs.

Yeah, they are the same fixes that you already tested, just slightly
reworded (and with a WARN_ON actually removed, but you never hit that
one).

Does the btrfs test that fails actually require a btrfs filesystem?

               Linus