[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191207144126.14320-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2019 22:41:25 +0800
From: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>
To: dinghao.liu@....edu.cn, kjlu@....edu
Cc: pakki001@....edu, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fs: Fix a missing check bug
The return value of link_free_space(ctl, info) is checked out-sync. Only one branch of an if statement checks this return value after WARN_ON(ret).
Since this path pair is similar in semantic, there might be a missing check bug.
Fix this by simply adding a check on ret.
Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>
---
fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
index 3283da419200..acbb3a59d344 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
@@ -2437,6 +2437,8 @@ int btrfs_remove_free_space(struct btrfs_block_group *block_group,
if (info->bytes) {
ret = link_free_space(ctl, info);
WARN_ON(ret);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_lock;
} else {
kmem_cache_free(btrfs_free_space_cachep, info);
}
--
2.21.0 (Apple Git-122)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists