linux-kernel - memory leak in fasync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 07 Dec 2019 21:45:09 -0800
From:   syzbot <syzbot+4b1fe8105f8044a26162@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To:     bfields@...ldses.org, jlayton@...nel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: memory leak in fasync_helper

Hello,

syzbot found the following crash on:

HEAD commit:    bf929479 Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/..
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=123e91e2e00000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=874c75a332209d41
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=4b1fe8105f8044a26162
compiler:       gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=120faee2e00000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=178a0ef6e00000

IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+4b1fe8105f8044a26162@...kaller.appspotmail.com

BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff88812a4082a0 (size 48):
   comm "syz-executor670", pid 6989, jiffies 4294952355 (age 19.520s)
   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 46 00 00 03 00 00 00  .........F......
     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 6b 05 1f 81 88 ff ff  .........k......
   backtrace:
     [<000000002a74b343>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive  
include/linux/kmemleak.h:43 [inline]
     [<000000002a74b343>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:586 [inline]
     [<000000002a74b343>] slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3319 [inline]
     [<000000002a74b343>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x13f/0x2c0 mm/slab.c:3483
     [<00000000fa370506>] fasync_alloc fs/fcntl.c:895 [inline]
     [<00000000fa370506>] fasync_add_entry fs/fcntl.c:953 [inline]
     [<00000000fa370506>] fasync_helper+0x37/0xa9 fs/fcntl.c:982
     [<000000006c3eaaf1>] sock_fasync+0x4d/0xa0 net/socket.c:1293
     [<0000000098076f55>] ioctl_fioasync fs/ioctl.c:550 [inline]
     [<0000000098076f55>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x409/0x810 fs/ioctl.c:655
     [<00000000df24d2b9>] ksys_ioctl+0x86/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:713
     [<000000003fec9c80>] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:720 [inline]
     [<000000003fec9c80>] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:718 [inline]
     [<000000003fec9c80>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1e/0x30 fs/ioctl.c:718
     [<000000002bebbfe6>] do_syscall_64+0x73/0x1f0  
arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
     [<00000000722d8431>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff888128cdf240 (size 48):
   comm "syz-executor670", pid 6990, jiffies 4294952942 (age 13.650s)
   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 46 00 00 03 00 00 00  .........F......
     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 d8 02 19 81 88 ff ff  ................
   backtrace:
     [<000000002a74b343>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive  
include/linux/kmemleak.h:43 [inline]
     [<000000002a74b343>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:586 [inline]
     [<000000002a74b343>] slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3319 [inline]
     [<000000002a74b343>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x13f/0x2c0 mm/slab.c:3483
     [<00000000fa370506>] fasync_alloc fs/fcntl.c:895 [inline]
     [<00000000fa370506>] fasync_add_entry fs/fcntl.c:953 [inline]
     [<00000000fa370506>] fasync_helper+0x37/0xa9 fs/fcntl.c:982
     [<000000006c3eaaf1>] sock_fasync+0x4d/0xa0 net/socket.c:1293
     [<0000000098076f55>] ioctl_fioasync fs/ioctl.c:550 [inline]
     [<0000000098076f55>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x409/0x810 fs/ioctl.c:655
     [<00000000df24d2b9>] ksys_ioctl+0x86/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:713
     [<000000003fec9c80>] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:720 [inline]
     [<000000003fec9c80>] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:718 [inline]
     [<000000003fec9c80>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1e/0x30 fs/ioctl.c:718
     [<000000002bebbfe6>] do_syscall_64+0x73/0x1f0  
arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
     [<00000000722d8431>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

BUG: memory leak
unreferenced object 0xffff888128cdff60 (size 48):
   comm "syz-executor670", pid 6991, jiffies 4294953529 (age 7.780s)
   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 46 00 00 03 00 00 00  .........F......
     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 63 05 1f 81 88 ff ff  .........c......
   backtrace:
     [<000000002a74b343>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive  
include/linux/kmemleak.h:43 [inline]
     [<000000002a74b343>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:586 [inline]
     [<000000002a74b343>] slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3319 [inline]
     [<000000002a74b343>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x13f/0x2c0 mm/slab.c:3483
     [<00000000fa370506>] fasync_alloc fs/fcntl.c:895 [inline]
     [<00000000fa370506>] fasync_add_entry fs/fcntl.c:953 [inline]
     [<00000000fa370506>] fasync_helper+0x37/0xa9 fs/fcntl.c:982
     [<000000006c3eaaf1>] sock_fasync+0x4d/0xa0 net/socket.c:1293
     [<0000000098076f55>] ioctl_fioasync fs/ioctl.c:550 [inline]
     [<0000000098076f55>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x409/0x810 fs/ioctl.c:655
     [<00000000df24d2b9>] ksys_ioctl+0x86/0xb0 fs/ioctl.c:713
     [<000000003fec9c80>] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:720 [inline]
     [<000000003fec9c80>] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:718 [inline]
     [<000000003fec9c80>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1e/0x30 fs/ioctl.c:718
     [<000000002bebbfe6>] do_syscall_64+0x73/0x1f0  
arch/x86/entry/common.c:290
     [<00000000722d8431>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9



---
This bug is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this bug report. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
syzbot can test patches for this bug, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches