linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: rockchip: Track more files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e4dc0f27-6a26-3b29-11fd-231f686fce91@rock-chips.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Dec 2019 16:18:00 +0800
From:   Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: rockchip: Track more files

Hi Miquel,

On 2019/12/4 下午5:07, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> The current list misses a lot of drivers not prefixed or suffixed by
> "rockchip". For instance, there are plenty drivers called rk808 and
> rk805 which are currently not tracked (clk, regulator, pinctrl, RTC,
> MFD, includes, bindings). Add them to the list under the Rockchip
> entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> ---
>
> Hi Heiko,
>
> You are right we should try to check more often your tree. Also, here
> is a patch so that you are Cc'ed for all Rockchip related patches
> because the current list is not exhaustive at all (not sure it is
> voluntary or not though).
>
> Cheers,
> Miquèl
>
>   MAINTAINERS | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index cba1095547fd..a9564e6cb872 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2198,12 +2198,16 @@ L:	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
>   T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mmind/linux-rockchip.git
>   S:	Maintained
>   F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-rk3x.txt
> +F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/*/*rk80*
>   F:	arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3*
>   F:	arch/arm/boot/dts/rv1108*
>   F:	arch/arm/mach-rockchip/
> +F:	include/*/*/rk808.h
> +F:	include/*/*/*/rk808.h
>   F:	drivers/clk/rockchip/
>   F:	drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c
>   F:	drivers/*/*rockchip*
> +F:	drivers/*/*rk80*
>   F:	drivers/*/*/*rockchip*
>   F:	sound/soc/rockchip/
>   N:	rockchip
For the Rockchip PMIC, is it better to have a NEW MAINTAINER entry like 
"ROCKCHIP PMIC DRIVER"
which share the same mailing list linux-rockchip@, because there is not 
only rk808,
but also rk805, rk809, rk817, rk818, and may be more to come.

BTW, we should use 'rk8' instead of 'rk80' to match all the Rockchip PMICs.


Thanks,
- Kever