[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191209090020.GG3468@dell>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 09:00:20 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: sm501: fix mismatches of request_mem_region
On Sat, 16 Nov 2019, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> This driver misuses release_resource + kfree to match request_mem_region,
> which is incorrect.
> The right way is to use release_mem_region.
> Replace the mismatched calls with the right ones to fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/sm501.c | 19 +++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/sm501.c b/drivers/mfd/sm501.c
> index 154270f8d8d7..e49787e6bb93 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/sm501.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/sm501.c
> @@ -1086,8 +1086,7 @@ static int sm501_register_gpio(struct sm501_devdata *sm)
> iounmap(gpio->regs);
>
> err_claimed:
> - release_resource(gpio->regs_res);
> - kfree(gpio->regs_res);
> + release_mem_region(iobase, 0x20);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1095,6 +1094,7 @@ static int sm501_register_gpio(struct sm501_devdata *sm)
> static void sm501_gpio_remove(struct sm501_devdata *sm)
> {
> struct sm501_gpio *gpio = &sm->gpio;
> + resource_size_t iobase = sm->io_res->start + SM501_GPIO;
Shouldn't this be 'struct resource *'?
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists