[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191209121726.GU980@Air-de-Roger>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 13:17:26 +0100
From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
To: Paul Durrant <pdurrant@...zon.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] xen-blkback: support dynamic unbind/bind
On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 02:01:23PM +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> By simply re-attaching to shared rings during connect_ring() rather than
> assuming they are freshly allocated (i.e assuming the counters are zero)
> it is possible for vbd instances to be unbound and re-bound from and to
> (respectively) a running guest.
>
> This has been tested by running:
>
> while true; do dd if=/dev/urandom of=test.img bs=1M count=1024; done
>
> in a PV guest whilst running:
>
> while true;
> do echo vbd-$DOMID-$VBD >unbind;
> echo unbound;
> sleep 5;
> echo vbd-$DOMID-$VBD >bind;
> echo bound;
> sleep 3;
> done
So this does unbind blkback while leaving the PV interface as
connected?
Thanks, Roger.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists