lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191209125239.46054-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Date:   Mon,  9 Dec 2019 12:52:39 +0000
From:   Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: avoid unneeded .list_voltage calls

Inside machine_constraints_voltage() a loop is in charge of verifying that
each of the defined voltages are within the configured constraints and
that those constraints are in fact compatible with the available voltages'
list.

When the registered regulator happens to be defined with a wide range of
possible voltages the above O(n) loop can be costly.
Moreover since this behaviour is triggered during the registration process,
it means also that it can be easily triggered at probe time, slowing down
considerably some module loading.

On the other side if such wide range of voltage values happens to be also
continuous and without discontinuity of any kind, the above potentially
cumbersome operation is also useless.

For these reasons, avoid such .list_voltage poll loop when regulator is
described as 'continuous_voltage_range' as is, indeed, similarly already
done inside regulator_is_supported_voltage().

Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 679ad3d2ed23..580fbdd3c97e 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -1198,6 +1198,10 @@ static int machine_constraints_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 
+		/* no need to loop voltages if range is continuous */
+		if (rdev->desc->continuous_voltage_range)
+			return 0;
+
 		/* initial: [cmin..cmax] valid, [min_uV..max_uV] not */
 		for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
 			int	value;
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ