lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191209170057.GH2889@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date:   Mon, 9 Dec 2019 09:00:57 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-doc <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, notify@...nel.org,
        SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation/barriers/kokr: Remove references to
 [smp_]read_barrier_depends()

On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 09:44:33AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 02:51:56PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 11:38:22PM +0100, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 11:08 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > But since Jon seems to be taking these in his capacity and Documentation
> > > > maintainer, could you please resend CCing him?  If we have these changes
> > > > scattered across too many trees, someone is going to get confused,
> > > > and it probably will be me.  ;-)
> > > 
> > > Agreed, CC-ing Jon to this mail.  That said, this is a followup of Will's
> > > patch[1] and the patch is also not queued in Jon's tree.  So, I would like to
> > > hear Will's opinion either, if possible.
> > > 
> > > [1]  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191108170120.22331-10-will@kernel.org/
> > 
> > Ah, this one got caught out in the conversion from .html to .rst.
> > 
> > I did get an ack on one of those, and thus queued it.  I clearly need to
> > take another look at Will's series, and thank you for the reminder!
> 
> I was planning to include this in the next posting of my series, but I was
> waiting for the merge window to close first. Now that we have -rc1, I'll
> post it this week, although the patches are also queued up in my tree here
> [1] (warning -- rebasing development branch).
> 
> I'll leave the patches that are unrelated to smp_read_barrier_depends() to
> Paul and Jon, unless they indicate a preference to the contrary.

I don't know about Jon, but I might need a reminder as to which patches
those are.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

> Will
> 
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/will/linux.git/log/?h=lto

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ