[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <977971ed-f77f-847a-89ab-0ddf45abf24d@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 19:33:59 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Xiaotao Yin <xiaotao.yin@...driver.com>, joro@...tes.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kexin.Hao@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] iommu/iova: Init the struct iova to fix the possible
memleak
On 09/12/2019 8:24 am, Xiaotao Yin wrote:
> During ethernet(Marvell octeontx2) set ring buffer test:
> ethtool -G eth1 rx <rx ring size> tx <tx ring size>
> following kmemleak will happen sometimes:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff000b85421340 (size 64):
> comm "ethtool", pid 867, jiffies 4295323539 (age 550.500s)
> hex dump (first 64 bytes):
> 80 13 42 85 0b 00 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ..B.............
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<000000001b204ddf>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1b0/0x350
> [<00000000d9ef2e50>] alloc_iova+0x3c/0x168
> [<00000000ea30f99d>] alloc_iova_fast+0x7c/0x2d8
> [<00000000b8bb2f1f>] iommu_dma_alloc_iova.isra.0+0x12c/0x138
> [<000000002f1a43b5>] __iommu_dma_map+0x8c/0xf8
> [<00000000ecde7899>] iommu_dma_map_page+0x98/0xf8
> [<0000000082004e59>] otx2_alloc_rbuf+0xf4/0x158
> [<000000002b107f6b>] otx2_rq_aura_pool_init+0x110/0x270
> [<00000000c3d563c7>] otx2_open+0x15c/0x734
> [<00000000a2f5f3a8>] otx2_dev_open+0x3c/0x68
> [<00000000456a98b5>] otx2_set_ringparam+0x1ac/0x1d4
> [<00000000f2fbb819>] dev_ethtool+0xb84/0x2028
> [<0000000069b67c5a>] dev_ioctl+0x248/0x3a0
> [<00000000af38663a>] sock_ioctl+0x280/0x638
> [<000000002582384c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8b0/0xa80
> [<000000004e1a2c02>] ksys_ioctl+0x84/0xb8
>
> The reason:
> When alloc_iova_mem() without initial with Zero, sometimes fpn_lo will equal to
> IOVA_ANCHOR by chance, so when return from __alloc_and_insert_iova_range() with
> -ENOMEM(iova32_full), the new_iova will not be freed in free_iova_mem().
Ooh, subtle... nice catch!
I suppose we could also open-code the kmem_cache_free() call in
alloc_iova() to bypass the check entirely because "we know what we're
doing", but only if the zeroing proves to have a measurable overhead.
> Fixes: bb68b2fbfbd6 ("iommu/iova: Add rbtree anchor node")
> Signed-off-by: Xiaotao Yin <xiaotao.yin@...driver.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iova.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iova.c b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
> index 41c605b0058f..2c27a661632c 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iova.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iova.c
> @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(iova_cache_mutex);
>
> struct iova *alloc_iova_mem(void)
> {
> - return kmem_cache_alloc(iova_cache, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + return kmem_cache_alloc(iova_cache, GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_ZERO);
FWIW there is a kmem_cache_zalloc() helper, which seems fairly
well-established. Either way, though,
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(alloc_iova_mem);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists