linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v1 1/2] um: drivers: remove support for UML_NET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Dec 2019 01:02:58 +0100 (CET)
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc:     anton ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        davidgow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 1/2] um: drivers: remove support for UML_NET_PCAP

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Brendan Higgins" <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
>> IMHO we should at least mark them as "obsolete" and start preparing to
>> remove them.
> 
> Alright, I will send a patch out which marks the other network drivers
> as "obsolete".
> 
> Clarification: Should I mark all UML network devices as "obsolete"
> except for NET_VECTOR? Daemon and MCAST looked to me (I am not a
> networking expert), like they might not be covered by vector.

No. Why?

Thanks,
//richard