[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1785498655.111829.1575936178298.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 01:02:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc: anton ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
davidgow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 1/2] um: drivers: remove support for UML_NET_PCAP
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Brendan Higgins" <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
>> IMHO we should at least mark them as "obsolete" and start preparing to
>> remove them.
>
> Alright, I will send a patch out which marks the other network drivers
> as "obsolete".
>
> Clarification: Should I mark all UML network devices as "obsolete"
> except for NET_VECTOR? Daemon and MCAST looked to me (I am not a
> networking expert), like they might not be covered by vector.
No. Why?
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists