[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191210170841.GA23357@krava>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:08:41 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, will@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf top for arm64?
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 04:52:52PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 10/12/2019 16:36, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 04:13:49PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I find to my surprise that "perf top" does not work for arm64:
> > >
> > > root@...ntu:/home/john/linux# tools/perf/perf top
> > > Couldn't read the cpuid for this machine: No such file or directory
> >
>
> Hi Jirka,
>
> > there was recent change that check on cpuid and quits:
> > 608127f73779 perf top: Initialize perf_env->cpuid, needed by the per arch annotation init routine
> >
>
> ok, this is new code. I obviously didn't check the git history...
>
> But, apart from this, there are many other places where get_cpuid() is
> called. I wonder what else we're missing out on, and whether we should still
> add it.
right, I was just wondering how come vendor events are working for you,
but realized we have get_cpuid_str being called in there ;-)
I think we should add it as you have it prepared already,
could you post it with bigger changelog that would explain
where it's being used for arm?
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists