[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191210210735.9077-290-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:07:14 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 329/350] crypto: sun4i-ss - Fix 64-bit size_t warnings
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
[ Upstream commit d6e9da21ee8246b5e556b3b153401ab045adb986 ]
If you try to compile this driver on a 64-bit platform then you
will get warnings because it mixes size_t with unsigned int which
only works on 32-bit.
This patch fixes all of the warnings.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Acked-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Tested-by: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-cipher.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-cipher.c b/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-cipher.c
index 6536fd4bee657..7e5e092a23b3c 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-cipher.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/sunxi-ss/sun4i-ss-cipher.c
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ static int noinline_for_stack sun4i_ss_opti_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq)
oi = 0;
oo = 0;
do {
- todo = min3(rx_cnt, ileft, (mi.length - oi) / 4);
+ todo = min(rx_cnt, ileft);
+ todo = min_t(size_t, todo, (mi.length - oi) / 4);
if (todo) {
ileft -= todo;
writesl(ss->base + SS_RXFIFO, mi.addr + oi, todo);
@@ -87,7 +88,8 @@ static int noinline_for_stack sun4i_ss_opti_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq)
rx_cnt = SS_RXFIFO_SPACES(spaces);
tx_cnt = SS_TXFIFO_SPACES(spaces);
- todo = min3(tx_cnt, oleft, (mo.length - oo) / 4);
+ todo = min(tx_cnt, oleft);
+ todo = min_t(size_t, todo, (mo.length - oo) / 4);
if (todo) {
oleft -= todo;
readsl(ss->base + SS_TXFIFO, mo.addr + oo, todo);
@@ -239,7 +241,8 @@ static int sun4i_ss_cipher_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq)
* todo is the number of consecutive 4byte word that we
* can read from current SG
*/
- todo = min3(rx_cnt, ileft / 4, (mi.length - oi) / 4);
+ todo = min(rx_cnt, ileft / 4);
+ todo = min_t(size_t, todo, (mi.length - oi) / 4);
if (todo && !ob) {
writesl(ss->base + SS_RXFIFO, mi.addr + oi,
todo);
@@ -253,8 +256,8 @@ static int sun4i_ss_cipher_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq)
* we need to be able to write all buf in one
* pass, so it is why we min() with rx_cnt
*/
- todo = min3(rx_cnt * 4 - ob, ileft,
- mi.length - oi);
+ todo = min(rx_cnt * 4 - ob, ileft);
+ todo = min_t(size_t, todo, mi.length - oi);
memcpy(buf + ob, mi.addr + oi, todo);
ileft -= todo;
oi += todo;
@@ -274,7 +277,8 @@ static int sun4i_ss_cipher_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq)
spaces = readl(ss->base + SS_FCSR);
rx_cnt = SS_RXFIFO_SPACES(spaces);
tx_cnt = SS_TXFIFO_SPACES(spaces);
- dev_dbg(ss->dev, "%x %u/%u %u/%u cnt=%u %u/%u %u/%u cnt=%u %u\n",
+ dev_dbg(ss->dev,
+ "%x %u/%zu %u/%u cnt=%u %u/%zu %u/%u cnt=%u %u\n",
mode,
oi, mi.length, ileft, areq->cryptlen, rx_cnt,
oo, mo.length, oleft, areq->cryptlen, tx_cnt, ob);
@@ -282,7 +286,8 @@ static int sun4i_ss_cipher_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq)
if (!tx_cnt)
continue;
/* todo in 4bytes word */
- todo = min3(tx_cnt, oleft / 4, (mo.length - oo) / 4);
+ todo = min(tx_cnt, oleft / 4);
+ todo = min_t(size_t, todo, (mo.length - oo) / 4);
if (todo) {
readsl(ss->base + SS_TXFIFO, mo.addr + oo, todo);
oleft -= todo * 4;
@@ -308,7 +313,8 @@ static int sun4i_ss_cipher_poll(struct skcipher_request *areq)
* no more than remaining buffer
* no need to test against oleft
*/
- todo = min(mo.length - oo, obl - obo);
+ todo = min_t(size_t,
+ mo.length - oo, obl - obo);
memcpy(mo.addr + oo, bufo + obo, todo);
oleft -= todo;
obo += todo;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists