linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 37/91] x86/mce: Lower throttling MCE messages' priority to warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20191210223035.14270-37-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:29:41 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Benjamin Berg <bberg@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Christian Kellner <ckellner@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 37/91] x86/mce: Lower throttling MCE messages' priority to warning

From: Benjamin Berg <bberg@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit 9c3bafaa1fd88e4dd2dba3735a1f1abb0f2c7bb7 ]

On modern CPUs it is quite normal that the temperature limits are
reached and the CPU is throttled. In fact, often the thermal design is
not sufficient to cool the CPU at full load and limits can quickly be
reached when a burst in load happens. This will even happen with
technologies like RAPL limitting the long term power consumption of
the package.

Also, these limits are "softer", as Srinivas explains:

"CPU temperature doesn't have to hit max(TjMax) to get these warnings.
OEMs ha[ve] an ability to program a threshold where a thermal interrupt
can be generated. In some systems the offset is 20C+ (Read only value).

In recent systems, there is another offset on top of it which can be
programmed by OS, once some agent can adjust power limits dynamically.
By default this is set to low by the firmware, which I guess the
prime motivation of Benjamin to submit the patch."

So these messages do not usually indicate a hardware issue (e.g.
insufficient cooling). Log them as warnings to avoid confusion about
their severity.

 [ bp: Massage commit mesage. ]

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <bberg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Christian Kellner <ckellner@...hat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191009155424.249277-1-bberg@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
index c460c91d0c8fd..be2439592b0ec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int therm_throt_process(bool new_event, int event, int level)
 	/* if we just entered the thermal event */
 	if (new_event) {
 		if (event == THERMAL_THROTTLING_EVENT)
-			pr_crit("CPU%d: %s temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = %lu)\n",
+			pr_warn("CPU%d: %s temperature above threshold, cpu clock throttled (total events = %lu)\n",
 				this_cpu,
 				level == CORE_LEVEL ? "Core" : "Package",
 				state->count);
-- 
2.20.1