lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191210042002.3490-6-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon,  9 Dec 2019 20:19:59 -0800
From:   paulmck@...nel.org
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/9] rcu: Add a hlist_nulls_unhashed_lockless() function

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>

This commit adds an hlist_nulls_unhashed_lockless() to allow lockless
checking for whether or note an hlist_nulls_node is hashed or not.
While in the area, this commit also adds a docbook comment to the existing
hlist_nulls_unhashed() function.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/list_nulls.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/list_nulls.h b/include/linux/list_nulls.h
index 1ecd356..fa6e847 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_nulls.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_nulls.h
@@ -56,11 +56,33 @@ static inline unsigned long get_nulls_value(const struct hlist_nulls_node *ptr)
 	return ((unsigned long)ptr) >> 1;
 }
 
+/**
+ * hlist_nulls_unhashed - Has node been removed and reinitialized?
+ * @h: Node to be checked
+ *
+ * Not that not all removal functions will leave a node in unhashed state.
+ * For example, hlist_del_init_rcu() leaves the node in unhashed state,
+ * but hlist_nulls_del() does not.
+ */
 static inline int hlist_nulls_unhashed(const struct hlist_nulls_node *h)
 {
 	return !h->pprev;
 }
 
+/**
+ * hlist_nulls_unhashed_lockless - Has node been removed and reinitialized?
+ * @h: Node to be checked
+ *
+ * Not that not all removal functions will leave a node in unhashed state.
+ * For example, hlist_del_init_rcu() leaves the node in unhashed state,
+ * but hlist_nulls_del() does not.  Unlike hlist_nulls_unhashed(), this
+ * function may be used locklessly.
+ */
+static inline int hlist_nulls_unhashed_lockless(const struct hlist_nulls_node *h)
+{
+	return !READ_ONCE(h->pprev);
+}
+
 static inline int hlist_nulls_empty(const struct hlist_nulls_head *h)
 {
 	return is_a_nulls(READ_ONCE(h->first));
-- 
2.9.5

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ