[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191210072800.GY2665@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:28:00 +0200
From: "mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Nicholas Johnson <nicholas.johnson-opensource@...look.com.au>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux v5.5 serious PCI bug
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 01:33:49PM +0000, Nicholas Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 03:12:39PM +0200, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:34:04PM +0000, Nicholas Johnson wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have compiled Linux v5.5-rc1 and thought all was good until I
> > > hot-removed a Gigabyte Aorus eGPU from Thunderbolt. The driver for the
> > > GPU was not loaded (blacklisted) so the crash is nothing to do with the
> > > GPU driver.
> > >
> > > We had:
> > > - kernel NULL pointer dereference
> > > - refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
> > >
> > > Attaching dmesg for now; will bisect and come back with results.
> >
> > Looks like something related to iommu. Does it work if you disable it?
> > (intel_iommu=off in the command line).
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 03:12:39PM +0200, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:34:04PM +0000, Nicholas Johnson wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have compiled Linux v5.5-rc1 and thought all was good until I
> > > hot-removed a Gigabyte Aorus eGPU from Thunderbolt. The driver for the
> > > GPU was not loaded (blacklisted) so the crash is nothing to do with the
> > > GPU driver.
> > >
> > > We had:
> > > - kernel NULL pointer dereference
> > > - refcount_t: underflow; use-after-free.
> > >
> > > Attaching dmesg for now; will bisect and come back with results.
> >
> > Looks like something related to iommu. Does it work if you disable it?
> > (intel_iommu=off in the command line).
> I thought it could be that, too.
>
> The attachment "dmesg-4" from the original email is with iommu parameters.
> The attachment "dmesg-5" from the original email is with no iommu parameters.
> Attaching here "dmesg-6" with the iommu explicitly set off like you said.
>
> No difference, still broken. Although, with iommu off, there are less stack traces.
>
> Could it be sysfs-related?
Bisect would probably be the best option to find the culprit commit.
There are couple of commits done for pciehp so reverting them one by one
may help as well:
87d0f2a5536f PCI: pciehp: Prevent deadlock on disconnect
75fcc0ce72e5 PCI: pciehp: Do not disable interrupt twice on suspend
b94ec12dfaee PCI: pciehp: Refactor infinite loop in pcie_poll_cmd()
157c1062fcd8 PCI: pciehp: Avoid returning prematurely from sysfs requests
Powered by blists - more mailing lists