[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1575965693-30395-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 02:14:53 -0600
From: frowand.list@...il.com
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] of: refcount leak when phandle_cache entry replaced
From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
of_find_node_by_phandle() does not do an of_node_put() of the existing
node in a phandle cache entry when that node is replaced by a new node.
Reported-by: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Fixes: b8a9ac1a5b99 ("of: of_node_get()/of_node_put() nodes held in phandle cache")
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
---
Checkpatch will warn about a line over 80 characters. Let me know
if that bothers you.
drivers/of/base.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index db7fbc0c0893..b57a57752294 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -1261,6 +1261,8 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle)
if (np->phandle == handle &&
!of_node_check_flag(np, OF_DETACHED)) {
if (phandle_cache) {
+ if (phandle_cache[masked_handle])
+ of_node_put(phandle_cache[masked_handle]);
/* will put when removed from cache */
of_node_get(np);
phandle_cache[masked_handle] = np;
--
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists