[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <75188d0f-c609-5417-aa2e-354e76b7ba6e@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 20:24:55 +1100
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...nel.org, david@...hat.com,
jgross@...e.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] mm/hotplug: Only respect mem= parameter during boot
stage
On 10/12/19 7:44 pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> In commit 357b4da50a62 ("x86: respect memory size limiting via mem=
> parameter") a global varialbe global max_mem_size is added to store
typo ^^^
> the value parsed from 'mem= ', then checked when memory region is
> added. This truly stops those DIMM from being added into system memory
> during boot-time.
>
> However, it also limits the later memory hotplug functionality. Any
> memory board can't be hot added any more if its region is beyond the
> max_mem_size. System will print error like below:
>
> [ 216.387164] acpi PNP0C80:02: add_memory failed
> [ 216.389301] acpi PNP0C80:02: acpi_memory_enable_device() error
> [ 216.392187] acpi PNP0C80:02: Enumeration failure
>
> From document of 'mem= ' parameter, it should be a restriction during
> boot, but not impact the system memory adding/removing after booting.
>
> mem=nn[KMG] [KNL,BOOT] Force usage of a specific amount of memory
> ...
>
> So fix it by also checking if it's during boot-time when restrict memory
> adding. Otherwise, skip the restriction.
>
The fix looks reasonable, but I don't get the use case. Booting with mem= is
generally a debug option, is this for debugging memory hotplug + limited memory?
Balbir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists