[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191210102023.GF980@Air-de-Roger>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 11:21:49 +0100
From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
To: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
CC: <axboe@...nel.dk>, <sjpark@...zon.com>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
<pdurrant@...zon.com>, SeongJae Park <sjpark@...zon.de>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 1/2] xenbus/backend: Add memory pressure
handler callback
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 11:16:35AM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 08:06:27AM +0000, SeongJae Park wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/xen/xenbus.h b/include/xen/xenbus.h
> > index 869c816d5f8c..cdb075e4182f 100644
> > --- a/include/xen/xenbus.h
> > +++ b/include/xen/xenbus.h
> > @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ struct xenbus_driver {
> > struct device_driver driver;
> > int (*read_otherend_details)(struct xenbus_device *dev);
> > int (*is_ready)(struct xenbus_device *dev);
> > + unsigned (*reclaim)(struct xenbus_device *dev);
>
> ... hence I wonder why it's returning an unsigned when it's just
> ignored.
>
> IMO it should return an int to signal errors, and the return should be
> ignored.
Meant to write 'shouldn't be ignored' sorry.
Roger.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists