[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq18snlnel6.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 20:39:49 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Lee Duncan <LDuncan@...e.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"wubo \(T\)" <wubo40@...wei.com>,
"cleech\@redhat.com" <cleech@...hat.com>,
"jejb\@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"open-iscsi\@googlegroups.com" <open-iscsi@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@...uni-regensburg.de>,
Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@...wei.com>,
"liuzhiqiang \(I\)" <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] scsi: avoid potential deadlock in iscsi_if_rx func
Lee,
> My sincere apologies. I told wubo I had already reviewed the patch, so
> he didn't need another Reviewed-by from me. I see I was wrong.
OK.
The patch was all mangled so I had to apply the changes by hand. Can't
say that I'm a big fan of retries going negative but I guess that's just
personal taste.
Applied to 5.5/scsi-fixes. Thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists