linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4] scsi: avoid potential deadlock in iscsi_if

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 09 Dec 2019 20:39:49 -0500
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Lee Duncan <LDuncan@...e.com>
Cc:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "wubo \(T\)" <wubo40@...wei.com>,
        "cleech\@redhat.com" <cleech@...hat.com>,
        "jejb\@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "open-iscsi\@googlegroups.com" <open-iscsi@...glegroups.com>,
        "linux-scsi\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@...uni-regensburg.de>,
        Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@...wei.com>,
        "liuzhiqiang \(I\)" <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] scsi: avoid potential deadlock in iscsi_if_rx func


Lee,

> My sincere apologies. I told wubo I had already reviewed the patch, so
> he didn't need another Reviewed-by from me. I see I was wrong.

OK.

The patch was all mangled so I had to apply the changes by hand. Can't
say that I'm a big fan of retries going negative but I guess that's just
personal taste.

Applied to 5.5/scsi-fixes. Thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering