[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191210121129.GA6110@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 12:11:29 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"phil.edworthy@...esas.com" <phil.edworthy@...esas.com>,
"dmurphy@...com" <dmurphy@...com>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
"jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"mchehab+samsung@...nel.org" <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"jacek.anaszewski@...il.com" <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
"mazziesaccount@...il.com" <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
"a.zummo@...ertech.it" <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com" <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"hofrat@...dl.org" <hofrat@...dl.org>,
"linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"pavel@....cz" <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/16] dt-bindings: regulator: Document ROHM BD71282
regulator bindings
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 11:14:48AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> Problem is that if no default voltages are given from DT, the the first
> voltage changes are likely to be slow (require register access - I
> guess the HW defaults are not working for many use-cases) - which may
> be undesirable.
I don't think that's likely to be a practical problem, and it's not
likely it'd be worse than always doing writes. A lot of things are
slower the first time you do them and you're still going to have to
do the writes no matter what.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists