[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191210020654.GA7171@archbook>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 18:06:54 -0800
From: Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
Cc: mdf@...nel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fpga: dfl: support multiple opens on feature device node.
Hi Xu,
Sorry for the delay.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 01:20:41PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> Each DFL functional block, e.g. AFU (Accelerated Function Unit) and FME
> (FPGA Management Engine), could implement more than one function within
> its region, but current driver only allows one user application to access
> it by exclusive open on device node. So this is not convenient and
> flexible for userspace applications, as they have to combine lots of
> different functions into one single application.
I'm not entirely sure how I feel about that, wouldn't the right solution
be to create more devices? If this ends up being 100% passthrough
basically, VFIO would be a better choice?
>
> This patch removes the limitation here to allow multiple opens to each
> feature device node for AFU and FME from userspace applications. If user
> still needs exclusive access to these device node, O_EXCL flag must be
> issued together with open.
Wouldn't you wanna default to have exclusive access, and then allow
multiple opens by means of a management interface, maybe?
>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/fpga/dfl-afu-main.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-main.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> drivers/fpga/dfl.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> drivers/fpga/dfl.h | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-afu-main.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-afu-main.c
> index e4a34dc..c6e0e07 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-afu-main.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-afu-main.c
> @@ -561,14 +561,16 @@ static int afu_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> if (WARN_ON(!pdata))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - ret = dfl_feature_dev_use_begin(pdata);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - dev_dbg(&fdev->dev, "Device File Open\n");
> - filp->private_data = fdev;
> + mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> + ret = dfl_feature_dev_use_begin(pdata, filp->f_flags & O_EXCL);
> + if (!ret) {
> + dev_dbg(&fdev->dev, "Device File Opened %d Times\n",
> + dfl_feature_dev_use_count(pdata));
Could those be trace events instead?
> + filp->private_data = fdev;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int afu_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> @@ -581,12 +583,14 @@ static int afu_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>
> mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> - __port_reset(pdev);
> - afu_dma_region_destroy(pdata);
> - mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> -
> dfl_feature_dev_use_end(pdata);
>
> + if (!dfl_feature_dev_use_count(pdata)) {
> + __port_reset(pdev);
> + afu_dma_region_destroy(pdata);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-main.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-main.c
> index 7c930e6..fda8623 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-main.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-main.c
> @@ -600,14 +600,16 @@ static int fme_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> if (WARN_ON(!pdata))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - ret = dfl_feature_dev_use_begin(pdata);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - dev_dbg(&fdev->dev, "Device File Open\n");
> - filp->private_data = pdata;
> + mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> + ret = dfl_feature_dev_use_begin(pdata, filp->f_flags & O_EXCL);
> + if (!ret) {
> + dev_dbg(&fdev->dev, "Device File Opened %d Times\n",
> + dfl_feature_dev_use_count(pdata));
> + filp->private_data = pdata;
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int fme_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> @@ -616,7 +618,10 @@ static int fme_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> struct platform_device *pdev = pdata->dev;
>
> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Device File Release\n");
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> dfl_feature_dev_use_end(pdata);
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> index 96a2b82..9909948 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> @@ -1079,6 +1079,7 @@ static int __init dfl_fpga_init(void)
> */
> int dfl_fpga_cdev_release_port(struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev, int port_id)
> {
> + struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata;
> struct platform_device *port_pdev;
> int ret = -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -1093,7 +1094,11 @@ int dfl_fpga_cdev_release_port(struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev, int port_id)
> goto put_dev_exit;
> }
>
> - ret = dfl_feature_dev_use_begin(dev_get_platdata(&port_pdev->dev));
> + pdata = dev_get_platdata(&port_pdev->dev);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> + ret = dfl_feature_dev_use_begin(pdata, true);
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> if (ret)
> goto put_dev_exit;
>
> @@ -1120,6 +1125,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dfl_fpga_cdev_release_port);
> */
> int dfl_fpga_cdev_assign_port(struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev, int port_id)
> {
> + struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata;
> struct platform_device *port_pdev;
> int ret = -ENODEV;
>
> @@ -1138,7 +1144,12 @@ int dfl_fpga_cdev_assign_port(struct dfl_fpga_cdev *cdev, int port_id)
> if (ret)
> goto put_dev_exit;
>
> - dfl_feature_dev_use_end(dev_get_platdata(&port_pdev->dev));
> + pdata = dev_get_platdata(&port_pdev->dev);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> + dfl_feature_dev_use_end(pdata);
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> +
> cdev->released_port_num--;
> put_dev_exit:
> put_device(&port_pdev->dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.h b/drivers/fpga/dfl.h
> index 9f0e656..4a9a33c 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.h
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.h
> @@ -205,8 +205,6 @@ struct dfl_feature {
> const struct dfl_feature_ops *ops;
> };
>
> -#define DEV_STATUS_IN_USE 0
> -
> #define FEATURE_DEV_ID_UNUSED (-1)
>
> /**
> @@ -219,8 +217,9 @@ struct dfl_feature {
> * @dfl_cdev: ptr to container device.
> * @id: id used for this feature device.
> * @disable_count: count for port disable.
> + * @excl_open: set on feature device exclusive open.
> + * @open_count: count for feature device open.
> * @num: number for sub features.
> - * @dev_status: dev status (e.g. DEV_STATUS_IN_USE).
> * @private: ptr to feature dev private data.
> * @features: sub features of this feature dev.
> */
> @@ -232,26 +231,46 @@ struct dfl_feature_platform_data {
> struct dfl_fpga_cdev *dfl_cdev;
> int id;
> unsigned int disable_count;
> - unsigned long dev_status;
> + bool excl_open;
> + int open_count;
> void *private;
> int num;
> struct dfl_feature features[0];
> };
>
> static inline
> -int dfl_feature_dev_use_begin(struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata)
> +int dfl_feature_dev_use_begin(struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata,
> + bool excl)
> {
> - /* Test and set IN_USE flags to ensure file is exclusively used */
> - if (test_and_set_bit_lock(DEV_STATUS_IN_USE, &pdata->dev_status))
> + if (pdata->excl_open)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> + if (excl) {
> + if (pdata->open_count)
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + pdata->excl_open = true;
> + }
> + pdata->open_count++;
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> static inline
> void dfl_feature_dev_use_end(struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata)
> {
> - clear_bit_unlock(DEV_STATUS_IN_USE, &pdata->dev_status);
> + pdata->excl_open = false;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(pdata->open_count <= 0))
> + return;
> +
> + pdata->open_count--;
> +}
> +
> +static inline
Feel free to drop the inline here. Your compiler will figure that out by
iteself.
> +int dfl_feature_dev_use_count(struct dfl_feature_platform_data *pdata)
> +{
> + return pdata->open_count;
> }
>
> static inline
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Again, sorry for the delay,
Moritz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists