[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191210133334.GA16369@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:33:34 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Milind Parab <mparab@...ence.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"nicolas.nerre@...rochip.com" <nicolas.nerre@...rochip.com>,
"antoine.tenart@...tlin.com" <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dhananjay Vilasrao Kangude <dkangude@...ence.com>,
"a.fatoum@...gutronix.de" <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>,
"brad.mouring@...com" <brad.mouring@...com>,
Parshuram Raju Thombare <pthombar@...ence.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: macb: add support for high speed interface
> >How has this been tested?
> >
>
> This patch is tested in 10G fixed mode on SFP+ module.
>
> In our own lab, we have various hardware test platforms supporting SGMII (through a TI PHY and another build that connects to a Marvell 1G PHY), GMII (through a Marvell PHY), 10GBASE-R (direct connection to SFP+), USXGMII (currently we can emulate this using an SFP+ connection from/to our own hardware)
Are any of these PHY using C45?
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists